The music video to 'Shout Out To My Ex' by Little Mix is focusing primarily om empowering the vocalists: mainly through the use of mise-en-scene and carefully chosen camera shots. In terms of costume, although the clothes they're are wearing are quite revealing, the girls are not objectified and portrayed as something male audience can gaze upon, being aware of their own sexuality and attractiveness; using it to empower themselves.
The empowering role of their own sexuality can be seen many times throughout the video - Carlsson's idea of commercial exhibitionism can be easily applied to this particular example. The girls are selling themselves as powerful and confident, each one of them being different from the other (adhering to Goodwin's 'demands of the record label'), thus appealing to a broad range of people from all sorts of different backgrounds, whether it be body size, race or regional identity . The band's main target audience is teenage girls and thanks to the diversity between the members, many girls will find it easier to emphatise with the band. The sexuality throughout the whole video is not particularily vulgar (except for maybe the first verse), even despite the little clothing in certain shots, and the video could easily be interpreted as one to help young girls feel confident and empowered.
His idea of binary opposition is also present in the video and only highlights the emphasis on empowerment of females: when the girls are driving past a hitchhiker (who looks oddly like discount Zayn Malik, Perrie's ex-boyfriend at the time when this song came out) and live him alone in the desert; they're in a positon of power, he's hopeless without them.


When it comes to camera shots, there's a large emphasis on close ups of individual members of the group and long/mid shots of the group as a whole. Each girl is marketed and shown as a separate human being, adhering to the aforementiond element of Goodwin's theory. The video has multiple references to the notion of looking, with the girls making frequent eye contact with the camera while lip syncing, but very little shots following the principle of the male gaze: the girls sexualise themselves rather than the camera sexualising them.
There are also frequent shots of the girls playing together/taking selfies/enjoying themselves, which adheres to Railton's idea of a pseudo-documentary: the whole video is mostly staged, with girls dancing and lip syncing to the camera, but those little snippets of footage make the whole experience of watching more interesting and let the target audience relate more to their idols.
In terms of editing, the video follows the usual conventions. Both Vernallis and Kaplan mention that a music video may disrupt or break the conventions of continuity editing (with Kaplan saying music videos, although being visual mediums, are different to normal films in a sense that the editing in films is usually seamless whereas it's made to look noticeable in a music video); in this one, there are constant cuts between girls, actions and scenes in montage-like style (althougb still remaining in rather chronological order).

I would like you to go through your analysis and highlight where you have named each of the 6 music video theorists. You should have references to Kaplan, Goodwin, Carlsson, Vernallis, Railton and Keazor + Wubenna.
ReplyDeleteIf you have missed references to any of the theorists, you need to add these.